Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 365 days older than Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2290
90.19298936589209%
Multi-Core
10745
77.35781137509%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
