Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-13500 vs Core i7-2600K

Core i5-13500 vs Core i7-2600K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13500

2.5 GHz | 14-core

Intel Core i5-13500 Logo
Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz

Buy for $244.85 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348547 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i7-2600K

3.4 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-2600K Logo
Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K

Buy for $70 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348546 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13500

2.5 GHz | 14-core

Intel Core i5-13500 Logo
Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz

Buy for $244.85 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348547 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i7-2600K

3.4 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-2600K Logo
Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K

Buy for $70 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348546 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500

  • Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2600K - 209 vs 172 FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 20 vs 8 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K

  • Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $70.0 vs $244.85
  • Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13500 - $0.41 vs $1.17 per FPS
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i5-13500 Logo
Core i5-13500

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

209

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.17/FPS

35.04273504273504%

Price, $

$244.85

28%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz

Buy for $244.85 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348547 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-2600K Logo
Core i7-2600K

Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011


FPS

172

82.29665071770334%

Value, $/FPS

$0.41/FPS

100%

Price, $

$70

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K

Buy for $70 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348546 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i5-13500 Logo
Core i5-13500

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Intel Core i7-2600K Logo
Core i7-2600K

Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-13500 Logo
Core i5-13500

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2403

100%

Multi-Core

12346

100%

Intel Core i7-2600K Logo
Core i7-2600K

Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011


Single-Core

668

27.798585101955887%

Multi-Core

2320

18.79151142070306%

Intel Core i5-13500 Logo

Intel Core i5-13500

vs
Intel Core i7-2600K Logo

Intel Core i7-2600K

Jan 4th, 2023
Release DateJan 9th, 2011
Core i5CollectionCore i7
Raptor LakeCodenameSandy Bridge
Intel Socket 1700SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
14
Cores4
20
Threads8
2.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed3.8 GHz
65 W
TDP95 W
10 nm
Process Size32 nm
25.0xMultiplier
34.0x
UHD Graphics 770Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 3000
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Core i5-13500 or Core i7-2600K

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.