Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1042 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Athlon 3000G - 225 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $63.83 vs $297.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13600K - $0.33 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
25%
Price, $
$297.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
195
86.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
35.909943714821765%
Multi-Core
1975
13.30145474137931%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |