Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3879 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 229% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3820 - 92 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $297.99 vs $319.88
- Up to 72% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3820 - $3.24 vs $11.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$297.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
28
30.434782608695656%
Value, $/FPS
$11.42/FPS
28.371278458844134%
Price, $
$319.88
93%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
23.151969981238274%
Multi-Core
2299
15.48356681034483%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |