Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2508 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 8% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $46.0 vs $50.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Celeron G4900 - $0.49 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i5-2405S - 96 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2405S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
94
97.91666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354227 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
94.23076923076923%
Price, $
$50
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |