Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4378 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 59% better in Rust than Core i5-2500K - 257 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $369.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 40% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-2500K - $1.44 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
162
63.035019455252915%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
59.75103734439834%
Price, $
$390.81
94%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354077 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$369
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354077 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
23.758734828981243%
Multi-Core
1921
12.661481676773004%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |