Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3504 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3210M - 279 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3210M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3210M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
493
19.417093343836157%
Multi-Core
999
7.192224622030238%
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
