Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3655 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in God of War than Core i5-3230M - 195 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 32 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3230M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3230M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
510
18.681318681318682%
Multi-Core
1026
5.958534177362216%
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
