Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3663 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 43% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3230M - 298 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3230M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3230M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
510
16.425120772946862%
Multi-Core
1026
4.699308386387578%
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
