Buy on Amazon
$69
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 238 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G630 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $37.49 vs $69.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450 - $0.32 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
56.14035087719299%
Price, $
$69
54%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-3450 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350209 minutes ago
Pentium G630
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
117
97.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G630 2.7 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G630
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Pentium G630
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G630
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
393
65.17412935323384%
Multi-Core
683
38.349241998877034%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
