Buy on Amazon
$95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2550 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $95.0 vs $372.84
- Up to 45% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-9900 - $3.52 vs $6.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 115% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-3450S - 58 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
27
46.55172413793103%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3450S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450S
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.43/FPS
54.743390357698296%
Price, $
$372.84
25%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9900 Coffee Lake Processor 3.1GHz 8.0GT/s 16MB LGA 1151 CPU, Retail
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
36.250775915580384%
Multi-Core
1681
23.334258745141586%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
