Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2412 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $69.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-9400F - $0.44 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3470 - 167 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 6 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
156
93.41317365269461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
65.67164179104478%
Price, $
$112
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
45.13788098693759%
Multi-Core
1840
38.06371534960695%
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |