Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570 is 637 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G630 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-4570 - $37.49 vs $70.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4570 - $0.32 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4570 - 65 vs 84 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
58.18181818181818%
Price, $
$70
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
117
92.1259842519685%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
393
35.95608417200366%
Multi-Core
683
22.276581865622962%
Intel Core i5-4570 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |