Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-4670K - 195 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1255
45.97069597069597%
Multi-Core
3544
20.58191532609327%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
