Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $99.95 vs $373.59
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-13700K - $0.75 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-6400 - 149 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
133
89.26174496644296%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
29.880478087649404%
Price, $
$373.59
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $373.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348733 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
39.11971830985915%
Multi-Core
3023
17.165407983646585%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |