Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1635 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-2600K - 156 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $70.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 28% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6400 - $0.46 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
71.875%
Price, $
$99.95
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349622 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
151
96.7948717948718%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
60.12601260126013%
Multi-Core
2320
76.74495534237512%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |