Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 334 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $99.95 vs $145.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - $0.85 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6400 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348735 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
70.24793388429752%
Price, $
$145
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
88.73801916932908%
Multi-Core
3023
42.469794886203985%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |