Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1579 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $99.95 vs $535.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900KS - $0.85 vs $4.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6400 - 126 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
118
93.65079365079364%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348975 minutes ago
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348974 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
62.41573033707866%
Multi-Core
3023
35.1675197766403%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |