Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3766 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-660 - 234 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-660 - $112.53 vs $149.95
- Up to 28% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-660 - $0.48 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-660 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280936 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |