Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 551 days older than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-7100T - 158 vs 156 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - $66.82 vs $74.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6600 - $0.43 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
91.48936170212765%
Price, $
$74
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354056 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
156
98.73417721518987%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
86.78071539657853%
Multi-Core
2260
63.626126126126124%
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |