Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-750 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-750 is 764 days older than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8120 - $75.0 vs $78.02
- Up to 4% better value when playing Rust than FX-8120 - $0.49 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280466 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |