Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3514 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $75.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-9700F - $0.68 vs $3.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-750 - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
110
89.43089430894308%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.17/FPS
21.451104100946374%
Price, $
$389.88
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
27.566171723692705%
Multi-Core
1200
19.18158567774936%
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |