Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 605 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $69.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.28 vs $19.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Core i5-7500T - 56 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
96.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349805 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.2/FPS
6.666666666666667%
Price, $
$1075
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
87.88598574821853%
Multi-Core
3076
36.89134084912449%
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |