Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2966 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $100.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.87 vs $8.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 128 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
115
89.84375%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361981 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.4/FPS
10.357142857142856%
Price, $
$1075
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
36.18368962787015%
Multi-Core
1280
15.35140321420005%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |