Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $99.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-11900F - $1.94 vs $3.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 49% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-7600 - 76 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
51
67.10526315789474%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
61.392405063291136%
Price, $
$240
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348911 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1373
63.24274527867342%
Multi-Core
3812
41.565805255697306%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |