Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $210.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 29% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900 - $0.96 vs $1.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-7600K - 220 vs 218 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
218
99.0909090909091%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359778 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
70.58823529411764%
Price, $
$299.98
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359778 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
88.43896713615024%
Multi-Core
4226
50.18406365039782%
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |