Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $140.0 vs $535.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KS - $0.75 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400 - 195 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
186
95.38461538461539%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
27.37226277372263%
Price, $
$535
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1353
76.01123595505618%
Multi-Core
4748
55.234993020009306%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |