Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 1940 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - $48.02 vs $175.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-8600 - $0.32 vs $1.1 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
29.09090909090909%
Price, $
$175
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349948 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
149
93.71069182389937%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |