Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 2960 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-540 - 241 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - $90.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-8600 - $0.44 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
60.273972602739725%
Price, $
$175
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349817 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
206
85.47717842323651%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
28.021978021978022%
Multi-Core
841
16.729659836880845%
Intel Core i5-8600 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |