Buy on Amazon
$160.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2840 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 112% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2400S - 51 vs 24 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $70.0 vs $160.91
- Up to 8% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-9400 - $2.92 vs $3.16 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
92.40506329113923%
Price, $
$160.91
43%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-9400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores 2. 90 GHz up to 4. 10 GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W Processors BX80684I59400
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
24
47.05882352941176%
Value, $/FPS
$2.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
35.83815028901734%
Multi-Core
1352
28.19603753910323%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
