Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 871 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i7-6800K - 201 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $108.0 vs $160.91
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-9400 - $0.55 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
68.75%
Price, $
$160.91
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
198
98.50746268656717%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |