Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i5-7500T - 200 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $69.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-9400F - $0.35 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
62.499999999999986%
Price, $
$112
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
98.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
80.55152394775035%
Multi-Core
3076
63.63260239966901%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |