Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 284 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $112.0 vs $827.21
- Up to 86% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10920X - $0.67 vs $4.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-9400F - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
167
97.6608187134503%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349514 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.84/FPS
13.842975206611571%
Price, $
$827.21
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349514 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
82.26865671641791%
Multi-Core
4834
42.59406115076218%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |