Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 922 days newer than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-L16G7 - 186 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 32 vs 5 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Single-Core
608
22.271062271062274%
Multi-Core
1164
6.759974446831987%
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lakefield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
5 | Cores | 24 |
5 | Threads | 32 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
7 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |