Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $225.99 vs $1300.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $1.87 vs $10.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Core i7-10700F - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 48 vs 16 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
121
96.8%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350209 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.4/FPS
17.98076923076923%
Price, $
$1300
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
96.70065986802639%
Multi-Core
7231
54.29901629496133%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |