Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-6800K - 191 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $108.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-10700F - $0.62 vs $1.18 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
52.54237288135594%
Price, $
$225.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
173
90.57591623036649%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
75.93052109181141%
Multi-Core
5661
78.2879269810538%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |