Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 2700 - 198 vs 163 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $185.0 vs $247.71
- Up to 10% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-10700K - $1.13 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
90.39999999999999%
Price, $
$247.71
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
163
82.32323232323232%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
65.2989449003517%
Multi-Core
5489
67.41586833701794%
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |