Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K and the more expensive Core i7-11700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-11700F - 270 vs 261 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $198.9 vs $202.98
- Up to 5% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-11700F - $0.74 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
261
96.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
94.87179487179486%
Price, $
$202.98
97%
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353898 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |