Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 4866 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 19% better in Valheim than Core i7-860 - 224 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $48.0 vs $339.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700 - $0.25 vs $1.52 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
16.447368421052634%
Price, $
$339.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362521 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
189
84.375%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |