Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3026 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $54.95 vs $389.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700F - $0.35 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2600 - 178 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
155
87.07865168539325%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362912 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
15.981735159817351%
Price, $
$389.88
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
612
39.5093608779858%
Multi-Core
2054
32.832480818414325%
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |