Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4102 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-2670QM - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2670QM - 32 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Single-Core
462
16.923076923076923%
Multi-Core
1450
8.420930367617167%
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
