Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4110 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 158% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-2675QM - 606 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Single-Core
449
14.460547504025763%
Multi-Core
1385
6.343608299363349%
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
