Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-3610QE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than Core i7-3610QE.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QE
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3610QE - 167 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3610QE - 32 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-3610QE
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QE | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
