Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3910 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-3612QM - 116 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
506
16.296296296296298%
Multi-Core
1681
7.699354188613566%
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
