Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 4098 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 84% better in Starfield than Core i7-3632QM - 81 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3632QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3632QM
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3632QM
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Single-Core
501
17.880085653104924%
Multi-Core
1680
10.171954468394285%
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
