Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3593 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 17 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 37% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3667U - 157 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-3667U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
