Buy on Amazon
$319.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2999 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3820 - 245 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $299.95 vs $319.88
- Up to 19% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-3820 - $1.22 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
213
86.93877551020408%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
81.33333333333333%
Price, $
$319.88
93%
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349580 minutes ago
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Micro Intel 1200 Core I5-10600 3.1GHZ MB
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
39.07536415452818%
Multi-Core
2299
37.230769230769226%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
