Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3319 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3820 - 192 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $240.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 38% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-3820 - $1.25 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
160
83.33333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
62.5%
Price, $
$319.88
75%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358092 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
28.420082911100874%
Multi-Core
2299
25.068149602006322%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |