Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2717 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $250.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 28% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-9700F - $1.7 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-3930K - 165 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
147
89.0909090909091%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360524 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
72.03389830508475%
Price, $
$389.88
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
606
39.122014202711426%
Multi-Core
2961
47.33056265984655%
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |