Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-3970X vs Core i7-7700

Core i7-3970X vs Core i7-7700: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-3970X

3.5 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i7-3970X Logo
Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition i7-3970X 3.5GHz 5.0GT/s 15MB LGA2011 Processor Without -fan, Retail BX80619I73970X

Buy for $209.74 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 354349 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-7700

3.6 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W

Buy for $167 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 354350 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-3970X

3.5 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i7-3970X Logo
Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition i7-3970X 3.5GHz 5.0GT/s 15MB LGA2011 Processor Without -fan, Retail BX80619I73970X

Buy for $209.74 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 354349 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-7700

3.6 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W

Buy for $167 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 354350 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7700 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1524 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3970X.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-3970X

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 12 vs 8 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700

  • Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3970X - 159 vs 151 FPS
  • Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-3970X - $167.0 vs $209.74
  • Up to 24% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3970X - $1.05 vs $1.39 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 65 vs 150 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Red Dead Redemption 2.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Core i7-3970X Logo
Core i7-3970X

Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012


FPS

151

94.9685534591195%

Value, $/FPS

$1.39/FPS

75.53956834532374%

Price, $

$209.74

79%

Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition i7-3970X 3.5GHz 5.0GT/s 15MB LGA2011 Processor Without -fan, Retail BX80619I73970X

Buy for $209.74 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 354349 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Core i7-7700

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


FPS

159

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.05/FPS

100%

Price, $

$167

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W

Buy for $167 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 354350 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Core i7-3970X Logo
Core i7-3970X

Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Core i7-7700

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-3970X Logo
Core i7-3970X

Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012


Single-Core

648

46.652267818574515%

Multi-Core

3305

74.10313901345292%

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Core i7-7700

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


Single-Core

1389

100%

Multi-Core

4460

100%

Intel Core i7-3970X Logo

Intel Core i7-3970X

vs
Intel Core i7-7700 Logo

Intel Core i7-7700

Nov 1st, 2012Release Date
Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7CollectionCore i7
Sandy Bridge ECodenameKaby Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores4
12
Threads8
3.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
150 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
35.0xMultiplier
36.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
HD 630
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.